idea for a more concrete deliverable plan for the gsha project

Gunnar Andersson gandersson at genivi.org
Wed Apr 25 17:08:20 EDT 2018


On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 16:03 +0000, Friedrich, Eugen (ADITG/ESB) wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> During the Genivi AMM we discussed shortly what we can deliver as a
> project result for the GSHA project.
> I would have one proposal:
> Create a matrix like this:

Yeah I think it looks exactly like what we should do to further organize the
different technologies that are available.  Thanks for the proposal, Eugen.
We'll discuss more on tomorrow's project call.

- Gunnar

Sorry, I mangled it here...  

> > --------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------
> > --------------------|
> >                         |
> > Hardware/OS                        |                                    
> >     |
> > --------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------
> > --------------------|
> >                         | Linux native <-> Linux native | Android virt
> > <-> Linux virt |
> > Technologies    | ECU: rcarh3 <-> rcarh3         |
> > hypervisor:Integrity          |
> >                         |                                             |
> > ECU: rcarH3 <-> rcarH3   |
> > --------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------
> > --------------------|
> > display sharing | existing, open source [link]    | existing, closed
> > source    |
> > --------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------
> > --------------------|
> > waltham           | poc existing, oss
> > [link]           |                                        |
> > --------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------
> > --------------------|
> > Ramses           | available:
> > [link]                      |                                         |
> > --------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------
> > --------------------|
> > GPU sharing    | available                               |
> > available                           |
> > --------------------+-------------------------------------+-------------
> > --------------------|
> 
> Criteria can be extended to e.g.: work in progress, required not
> exiting...
> 
> There should be links describing where to get, install and use technology,
> description of pro and cons, limitations.
> Ideally every cell in the table should have concrete responsible team or
> it should be stated as unmaintained.
> 
> Filling in a new technology or Hardware/OS might have of course some issue
> to disclose concrete project or interest
> Nevertheless please share you opinion about this approach
> 
> Project result will be then the table with the corresponding links...
> 
> We can continue discussion here or move discussion to here:
> https://at.projects.genivi.org/wiki/display/DIRO/GSHA+Deliverable+plan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> genivi-projects mailing list
> genivi-projects at lists.genivi.org
> https://lists.genivi.org/mailman/listinfo/genivi-projects




More information about the genivi-projects mailing list