GDP Maintenance Roadmap: proposal
paul.sherwood at codethink.co.uk
Fri Jan 15 11:14:14 EST 2016
On 2016-01-15 15:00, Stephen Lawrence wrote:
>> > Anyway, if we are going to do this move, I think this would be a
>> > for the meta-ivi maintainers, right?
>> Actually not necessarily, wrt to 'collaborating on the
>> 'meta-ivi-common' layer'.
>> The meta-ivi maintainers (Wind River) would be welcome to
>> but meta-ivi-common has shared maintainership as part of meta-agl
>> So everyone is welcome to collaborate on this - AGL is a fully open
> /Personal opinion
> I wrote a longer response but ultimately that bold statement saddens
> on more than one level.
I really have no idea why...
More information about the genivi-projects